
David Robinson
Former OpenAI safety lead
Capability 5Outlook 2
Where they stand
Against all 23 people scored in Week 41. Bars count people at each score; black is Robinson, the dashed line is the average.
What they've said
- Wednesday, Oct 7Week 41
In his first interview since leaving, Robinson told Ezra Klein
The A.I. industry has an unsafe culture
and thatwe're shipping new capability and risk every Tuesday.
He said OpenAI and its peers are making technology that
poses more risk than what was being made even six months ago
, and describedlots of cognitive dissonance
in publishing warnings while still training and deploying the models being warned about. He called for operational rigor and safety controls matching the most dangerous other industries.Details and sources
Asked how it ends, he said
The Ezra Klein Show (New York Times) via DNYUZI think we are going to survive.
Quotes come from a republished copy of the New York Times transcript. - Saturday, Oct 3Week 40
Robinson resigned from OpenAI and wrote in The Atlantic that the company's trial-and-error approach
by its very nature, guarantees periodic failures.
He spent three and a half years at OpenAI and led the writing of the safety reports released with its major launches. In the essay he said he had
never encountered a colleague who had experience making airplanes fly safely or nuclear reactors run without melting down
, and argued labs should be runlike nuclear-power plants or busy airports, with layers of redundancy and careful, time-consuming planning.
Details and sources
He also wrote
TechCrunchAn environment where things like this can happen is no place to grow artificial minds
andPerhaps I should have stayed and fought for fundamental shifts in our staffing and culture.
OpenAI told reporters it pauses training or holds back models when needed. The Atlantic page could not be opened; quotes come from TechCrunch's report on the essay.